Rabbi Druckman claimed that he has a right to voice his opinion against the plan and endorse the disobeying of order to remove civilians from their homes on the basis of freedom of speech and the Torah law.

Brizon, who challenged him for voicing opinions against the Government law, the army and the prime minister, claimed that he was not allowed to do so as a government employee.

In response, Rabbi Druckman, quoted a Supreme Court  rule maintaining that "Religion and religious laws are not creations of the irreligious lawmaker, therefore, it cannot be expected of secular law makers to intervene with questions discussing the duties of the Religious leaders and religious fields'. As to the question of the broadcaster how Rabbi Druckman intervenes in political themes, Rabbi Druckman retorted that the land of Israel is a perfectly religious issue, just as is Shabbos, Pesach and Tefillin.